Island views

One of the highlights on my recent woofing holidays in West Cork was the biodiversity day organised by the Irish Natural Forestry Foundation at the Manch Estate.
As Tim, my woofing host, was one of the speakers, I had had a close look at the schedule in advance and had decided that it was well worth traveling from Bantry to Dunmanway to attend as much of the day as possible. Indeed the talk on orchard and agroforesty in Ireland, given by Paul of Woodkerne Nursery, was inspiring and very informative, and while the hedgerow walk turned out to be a very wet outing, the event was a great way to meet like minded people.
But the highlight of the day was to be Tim’s population talk.

The human species has surely been the most successful in the Earth’s history. From a small beginning in Africa, approximately 200,000 years ago, migrations have led modern humans to populate the whole world.
As we all know, early humans were hunter gatherers, a lifestyle which implies a low population density, and indeed, in our early days, the human population was very small. Estimates vary, but it is almost certain that up to 10 000 years ago, humans beings on this planets were never more than one million, and probably a lot less. However, around 10,000 years ago, after the last ice age, things began to change and people began to settle down and domesticate plants and animals in the Middle East (and later on in America). The rise of agriculture, and the domestication of animals produced the most important transformation in human culture, and literally, changed the face of the Earth. Agriculture spread rapidly, and with its food supplies now more secure, the human population started to grow. Some other species did very well too. Thanks to their association with humans, sheep, horses or chicken are now more numerous than ever. The potato has successfully colonised Europe from its native America, and the apple tree has colonised North America. Wheat, corn and soya may look very unlikely competitors for tall trees, but thanks to humans, they are now doing far better than any tree species. Other species didn’t fare too well. 10 000 years ago, there were far more bears than humans in Britain. The list of species that have become extinct in modern times is rather depressing reading.
Around the time of Christ, the world population had grown to around 300 million people. By by the year 1800, the billion mark was reached.
However, it is really in the last century that human population growth has been truly phenomenal. In 1927, world population passed two billion. Sixty years later, in 1987, the world population was five billion, and in May 2009, the Earth’s population is estimated by the United States Census Bureau to be nearly 6.8 billions people. The world’s population is expected to reach about 9 billion by the year 2040, although this is in fact unlikely to happen.

Agriculture is what has allowed mankind to grow to this phenomenal size and has made us a force of nature.
It is generally assumed that global warming started in the 19th century with the burning of fossil fuel. But in fact, it probably can be tracked much further back, to the rise of agriculture, as suggested by William Ruddiman. For agriculture leads to deforestation, and as we all know, trees absorb CO2 from the atmosphere. Agriculture also made possible this phenomenal rise in human numbers, which eventually put so much pressure on natural resources that it lead to the burning of fossil fuels. If it hadn’t been for population pressure on timber resources, we would probably never have taken to burning coal. Let’s face it, that stuff stinks when burnt and getting it out of the ground is a very messy, unpleasant and dangerous job, even when compared to cutting trees. If it hadn’t been for the fact that we no longer had enough trees to cut, we probably would never have bothered.
With coal came the steam engine, and with it, further advances in food security, as we could now reliably transport food over greater distances. We had found yet another way to ward off hunger. Then came oil, an even better fuel for transport, and as it turned out, for agriculture.
The mechanisation of agriculture allowed more land to be cultivated using less labour while using less land to feed draft animals.
From 1950 to 1984, as the Green Revolution, which supported the latest population explosion, transformed agriculture around the world, grain production increased by 250%. The energy for the Green Revolution was provided by fossil fuels in the form of fertilizers (made mostly from natural gas), pesticides (made mostly from oil), not to mention hydrocarbon-fueled irrigation and further mechanisation of labour.
But, as we all know, oil is running out.
Furthermore, as Dale Pfeiffer puts it in his book “Eating Fossil Fuels: Oil, Food and the Coming Crisis in Agriculture”: ” Modern industrial agriculture is unsustainable. It has been pushed to the limit and is in danger of collapse. We have already appropriated all of the prime agricultural land on this planet… Even without considering energy depletion, our agriculture system is ready to collapse.”

Tim present the examples of of two remote islands in the South Pacific, taken form Jared Diamond’s remarkable book “Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Survive“, to illustrate how the ability to manage their own population is a key element in the success or failure of societies.
Both islands have in common extreme isolation, with no other major island within less than several days sailing. Because of this, they had to be totally self sufficient in food, and immigration was never an option. Both islands where also colonised by Polynesians, who were farmers and fishermen.
The first of these two islands is a success story. It is called Tikopia and it’s barely more than 2 square miles in size. Tikopians practice an intensive system of agriculture similar in principle to forest gardening. Their agricultural practices are strongly and consciously tied to the population density and all Tikopians are fully aware of the need to keep the island population level at around 1200. They use various means, including contraception, abortion, infanticide, and suicide to keep their population within this sustainable limit. When European came along in the 19th century and banned some of these practices, the population increased with disastrous results. Tikopians have now brought their population under control again, at a very slightly lower level than before Europeans arrived.
The second island is far better known. It is Easter island, one of the most isolated islands in the world (the nearest habitable land, Pitcairn, is 1300 miles to the west, a 2 weeks sea journey on a Polynesian canoe and only Tristan da Cunha, in the Southern Atlantic is more remote, but Tristan da Cunha has been inhabited only since the 19th century). At over sixty three square miles, Easter is a lot bigger than Tikopia, and therefore could support a much larger population. From the small group of settlers who navigated in canoes, most likely around the 9th century, the population of Easter island grew to several thousands, perhaps as much as thirty thousand, in the 16th century. Such a huge population on such a small piece of land put huge pressure on natural resources. All land bird species and sea bird colonies became extinct. The original subtropical moist broad leaf forests was entirely cut down and all of Easter island’s unique tree species also became extinct. With no more wood to build the canoes they needed to use for fishing, no more birds (other than the chicken they had brought with them) to provide them with protein, and an ecosystem in ruin, the population of Easter island collapsed catastrophically, and by the time the European arrived, it was down to less than three thousand.

The current level of human population on planet Earth is clearly unsustainable and has already led to massive environmental damage. As resources necessary to sustain such numbers, such as oil, clean water and arable land, become increasingly depleted, this will inevitably lead to a massive reduction in the number of humans living on this planet.
How is this reduction in human population going to happen?
Although this is still a daily occurrence in Africa and some part of Asia, in the Western world, where practically nobody starved to death since World War II, famine looks unlikely. But a quick look at history should suffice to convince most westerners that they just have been lucky so far. The list of famines on Wikipedia makes though provoking (and sobering) reading.
Famines will also bring increased insecurity, because hungry people, having absolutely nothing to lose, will do anything. Resources wars and food riots have already started, piracy is on the increase. Already, neighbours are killing one another over drinking water in part of India. Already, scores of desperate Africans are taking to sea in overcrowded boats, risking their lives to flee to Europe, while Mexicans face being shot to get to the US.
But the worse is no doubt still to come.

Indeed, as Tim puts it, the four horsemen of Apocalypse (Pestilence, War, Famine and Death) are likely to be busy in the 21st century.

As Ian, the organiser of the event, simply put it, Tim’s talk “connect the dots”.
Of course, all of us are aware that human population has exploded since the 19th century. Of course, most of us are aware that fossil fuel production is peaking now. Of course most of us are dimly aware that our food production and distribution system is largely dependent on cheap fossil fuels. But most of us fail to connect the dots and see that the inevitable consequences of Peak oil is going to be famine on a scale never seen in human history, and a dramatic reduction in human numbers.

Christophe

I have sinced done a bit more research on the subject of food security. For those with an interest in the subject, here’s some further reading, which should leave little doubt that we are heading for a massive food crisis.

• George Monbiot on the challenge of feeding seven or eight billion people while oil supplies are falling
• Food future, by the Soil Association
• Looming food crisis, an article in the Guardian

90% of the honey we eat in Ireland is imported.
The main reason for this sorry state of affair it that bee keeping isn’t economically viable. With 100 hives (which pretty much makes it a full time job), Tim produced 2 tonnes of honey last year, which he sells at 4 euros / lb wholesale. I let you do the maths, and realise that there isn’t much money in beekeeping… Irish honey has to compete against imported honey, which sells for as little as 2.60 / lb (at least that what we pay for the excellent organic, fair trade South American honey we have been eating lately at the centre). As is often the case with agriculture, it is cheaper (at least in the short run) to be importing stuff, rather that producing it ourselves.
This is where it is important to remember that money is a good servant, but a very bad master. Making our purchasing decision based solely on economic, rather than environmental or ethical considerations is short sighted at best (and in the long run, it’s usually downright stupid). As I write this, I wonder should have bought not 12, but 50 jars of honey from Tim, and offered to pay 10 euros for each. This would have been consistent with our decision to pay Frank and Christina to produce as much fruit and vegetable as possible for the yoga centre, rather than buying imported ones (which would be many times cheaper). And yet, Irish organic vegetable production gets more government support than beekeeping. (Still, 80% of all organic fruit and vegetable sold in this country come from abroad.).
So the number of bees and beekeepers in Ireland keeps dwindling.
Basically, because of disease and particularly the Varroa Mite (introduce from Asia by man), there are no longer any wild bees in Ireland. Any “wild” bee colony is in fact a swarm from a “domesticated” hive, and is doomed because without man help, bee colonies cannot survive any more.
Nearly half of Tim’s bee colonies had died last winter, and this seems to be quite common.
Now, if half of West Cork cattle or sheep population died for whatever reasons, you can be sure that this would be front page news and presumably, the Irish government would pay out millions of euros in compensation to affected farmers. But no one seems to care much about bees, and there no subsidies for beekeeping although around 80% of the income of an average sheep farm comes not from the sale of sheep, as you might naively expect, but from CAP subsidies.
There’s signs of hope however, both for organic vegetable production, and for beekeeping. As more and more people take to producing some of their own food as a hobby, organic gardening courses and beekeeping courses are getting increasingly popular (the organic gardening course we are running at macalla farm filled up quickly). So hopefully, more people will keep a few hives in their back garden or on a corner of their farms, enjoy home produced honey, and keep the Irish bees alive.
“Never doubt that a small, group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has”. (Margaret Mead)
Let’s hope so, anyway, for, as Tim puts it, if all the bees died, we might have to pollinate apple trees by hand, but who is going to pollinate the sycamores?

Christophe
Photo of the bee taken by Tim Rowe